Prediction of Calin Manda [890th] vs Hamid Reza Nadaf [873rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W L L L
Form
W L L L W W L W L LH2H: Manda 1 - 0 Nadaf
They have played 1 sets in total, with Manda winning 1 and Nadaf winning 0. The last match between Manda and Nadaf was at the M25 Antalya, 15-11-2023, Q2 round, Clay with Calin Manda getting the victory 6-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Calin Manda | 1 |
| Hamid Reza Nadaf | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 ret. | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 6 | Games Won | 1 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Calin Manda vs Hamid Reza Nadaf Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Manda 1 - 0 Nadaf
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Manda has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nadaf has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Manda, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nadaf has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Manda has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nadaf has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Manda has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nadaf winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Manda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 195/ 158), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Nadaf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 24/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 35/ 58).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Manda winning 0 times and Nadaf being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Manda winning 1 and Nadaf winning 0. The last match between Manda and Nadaf was at the M25 Antalya, 15-11-2023, Q2 round, Clay with Calin Manda getting the victory 6-1 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Manda and Nadaf have played a deciding set 0 times, with Manda winning 0 times and Nadaf 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Manda winning 0, and Nadaf 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Manda has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nadaf has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Manda has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nadaf has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Manda has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nadaf has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Calin Manda vs Hamid Reza Nadaf Best Odds For The Match
Calin Manda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Calin Manda
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bogdan Pavel
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michel Hopp
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Calin Manda
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Sarp Agabigun
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
81)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Attila Boros
Player
Calin Manda
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rafael Giotis
Player
Calin Manda
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
8
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Corentin Denolly
52%
(
54 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calin Manda
Player
Michael Agwi
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
11
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Hamid Reza Nadaf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gergely Madarasz
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
38
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matyas Fuele
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Sina Moghimi
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matyas Fuele
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Daniel Khazime
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Amirali Ghavam
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Manda vs Nadaf?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Manda Vs Nadaf is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (216/183) | Win/Loss | 43% (59/79) |
| 56% (491/387) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (139/168) |
| 52% (4145/3752) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1325/1375) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 683 | Aces Total | 73 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 697 | Total Double Faults | 161 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 194.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 80.56 |
| 62% (9563/15440) | 1st Serve % | 65% (2619/4026) |
| 65% (6211/9563) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1669/2619) |
| 50% (2964/5877) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (678/1407) |
| 45% (646/1445) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (183/403) |
| 39% (5823/14851) | Return Points Win % | 41% (1572/3860) |
| 56% (213/379) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (58/135) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (36/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (8/21) |
| 39% (37/96) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (12/34) |
| 86% (231/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (68/55) |
| 13% (231/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (68/13) |
| 11% (168/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (70/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
